2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 530 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | CU-X | Endeavor |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3835 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1875 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 81 L |