2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2005 MG ZT
To start off, 2005 MG ZT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MG ZT (175 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MG ZT weights approximately 140 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 240 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2005 MG ZT | |
| Make | Mazda | MG |
| Model | CU-X | ZT |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2497 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1485 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |
