2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2005 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2005 Nissan 350Z is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 107 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan 350Z (363 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2005 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | CU-X | 350Z |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3491 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 287 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 363 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1452 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 76 L |