2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL (221 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL weights approximately 1109 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL (510 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2006 Mercedes-Benz GL | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | CU-X | GL |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2987 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 221 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2454 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3080 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 100 L |
