2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 136 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. (195 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2008 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 2008 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
| Model | CU-X | Polo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1422 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1209 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |
