2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2009 Holden Cruze

To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: