2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2009 Subaru Tribeca
To start off, 2009 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,629 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Tribeca (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 2009 Subaru Tribeca is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Tribeca (335 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Subaru Tribeca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2009 Subaru Tribeca | |
Make | Mazda | Subaru |
Model | CU-X | Tribeca |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3629 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 335 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |