2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2010 Infiniti FX
To start off, 2010 Infiniti FX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Infiniti FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Infiniti FX (303 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Infiniti FX should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Infiniti FX weights approximately 374 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Infiniti FX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Infiniti FX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Infiniti FX (355 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2010 Infiniti FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2010 Infiniti FX | |
Make | Mazda | Infiniti |
Model | CU-X | FX |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3498 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 303 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 355 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1719 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 90 L |