2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi A3 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2011 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2011 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | CU-X | A3 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1460 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2578 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |
