2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2011 Ford F-350
To start off, 2011 Ford F-350 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 2011 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2011 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | CU-X | F-350 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 6200 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 548 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 132 L |