2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2011 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2011 Kia Carnival is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Carnival (142 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Carnival weights approximately 875 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Kia Carnival (310 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2011 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2011 Kia Carnival | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | CU-X | Carnival |
Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2902 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2220 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 75 L |