2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2011 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2011 Subaru Forester is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Subaru Forester (170 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Subaru Forester weights approximately 152 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Subaru Forester. (236 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2011 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Mazda | Subaru |
| Model | CU-X | Forester |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2500 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 170 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1497 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2616 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |
