2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2012 Chevrolet Captiva has manual transmission. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | CU-X | Captiva |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2384 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 65 L |