2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2012 Hyundai Terracan
To start off, 2012 Hyundai Terracan is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Hyundai Terracan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Hyundai Terracan (161 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Hyundai Terracan should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Hyundai Terracan weights approximately 817 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Hyundai Terracan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Hyundai Terracan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Hyundai Terracan (345 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2012 Hyundai Terracan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2012 Hyundai Terracan | |
| Make | Mazda | Hyundai |
| Model | CU-X | Terracan |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2902 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 345 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2162 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 75 L |
