2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2013 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2013 Honda Odyssey is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Honda Odyssey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Odyssey (245 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Odyssey should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Odyssey weights approximately 624 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda Odyssey (339 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2013 Honda Odyssey will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2013 Honda Odyssey | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | CU-X | Odyssey |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3471 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1969 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3000 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 80 L |