2001 Mazda Demio vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2001 Mazda Demio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Volvo PV 60 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2001 Mazda Demio. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1946 Volvo PV 60 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda Demio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 670 kg more than 2001 Mazda Demio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Demio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda Demio | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Demio | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2850 mm |