2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 134 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 469 kg more than 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
Because 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Transit Connect (174 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (163 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Transit Connect will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata. 2013 Ford Transit Connect has automatic transmission and 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata has manual transmission. 2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Transit Connect will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda MX-5 Miata | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | MX-5 Miata | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1534 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2113 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1230 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 58 L |