2001 Mazda Sport Wagon vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon (130 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon weights approximately 62 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon (183 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | Sport Wagon | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1232 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
