2001 Mazda Sport Wagon vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon (130 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon has manual transmission. 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda Sport Wagon | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | Sport Wagon | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |