2001 MCC ForTwo vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 2001 MCC ForTwo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Riley RM A weights approximately 555 kg more than 2001 MCC ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 MCC ForTwo | 1950 Riley RM A | |
Make | MCC | Riley |
Model | ForTwo | RM A |
Year Released | 2001 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2870 mm |