2001 MCC Smart vs. 2000 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2001 MCC Smart is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 656 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Mazda AZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda AZ weights approximately 30 kg more than 2001 MCC Smart.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 MCC Smart | 2000 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | MCC | Mazda |
| Model | Smart | AZ |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2600 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1820 mm | 2370 mm |
