2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
Model | CLK GTR | 3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4998 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2639 mm |