2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 150 kg more than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | CLK | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1950 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3690 mm |
