2001 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 43 kg more than 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | ML | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2606 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2155 kg | 2112 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 81 L |
