2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart vs. 1982 Opel Kadett
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 1,689 cc, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart weights approximately 690 kg more than 1982 Opel Kadett.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart has automatic transmission and 1982 Opel Kadett has manual transmission. 1982 Opel Kadett will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart | 1982 Opel Kadett | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Opel |
| Model | Smart | Kadett |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1689 cc | 991 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2520 mm |
