2001 Mercury Cougar vs. 1955 Singer Hunter
To start off, 2001 Mercury Cougar is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 2,543 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercury Cougar (196 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 261 kg more than 1955 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mercury Cougar | 1955 Singer Hunter | |
| Make | Mercury | Singer |
| Model | Cougar | Hunter |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 2543 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1407 kg | 1146 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2180 mm |
