2001 Mercury Cougar vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2001 Mercury Cougar is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercury Cougar (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 229 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mercury Cougar (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mercury Cougar | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Cougar | Cedric |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1314 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |