2001 Mercury Cougar vs. 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2001 Mercury Cougar is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 743 kg more than 2001 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mercury Cougar | 1973 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Mercury | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Cougar | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2543 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1407 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 107 L |
