2001 Mercury Cougar vs. 2005 Nissan Almera

To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,543 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercury Cougar (196 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Almera. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Almera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 277 kg more than 2005 Nissan Almera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mercury Cougar (228 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Almera. (162 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2001 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Almera.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Mercury Cougar 2005 Nissan Almera
Make Mercury Nissan
Model Cougar Almera
Year Released 2001 2005
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2543 cc 1769 cc
Horse Power 196 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 6750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 228 Nm 162 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.4 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 80 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1407 kg 1130 kg
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2540 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 60 L