2001 Mercury Villager vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 3,276 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2001 Mercury Villager. (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Villager weights approximately 430 kg more than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mercury Villager (271 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Camry. (268 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2001 Mercury Villager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mercury Villager | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mercury | Toyota |
Model | Villager | Camry |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3276 cc | 2999 cc |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 268 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2730 mm |