2001 MG Rover vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG Rover would be higher.
Because 2001 MG Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 MG Rover | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | MG | Volkswagen |
| Model | Rover | Polo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
