2001 MG X10 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 MG X10 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X10, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 MG X10 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | MG | Oldsmobile |
Model | X10 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2001 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |