2001 MG X20 vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 MG X20 | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | MG | Riley |
Model | X20 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |