2001 MG X20 vs. 1970 Triumph Stag
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1970 Triumph Stag. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph Stag.
Because 1970 Triumph Stag is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Triumph Stag. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 MG X20 has automatic transmission and 1970 Triumph Stag has manual transmission. 1970 Triumph Stag will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 MG X20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 MG X20 | 1970 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | MG | Triumph |
| Model | X20 | Stag |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 143 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
