2001 MG X20 vs. 2003 Noble M14
To start off, 2003 Noble M14 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X20 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Noble M14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Noble M14 (396 HP) has 219 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Noble M14 should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 2003 Noble M14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Noble M14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 MG X20 has automatic transmission and 2003 Noble M14 has manual transmission. 2003 Noble M14 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 MG X20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 MG X20 | 2003 Noble M14 | |
Make | MG | Noble |
Model | X20 | M14 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 396 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |