2001 MG X20 vs. 2010 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2010 Nissan Armada is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X20 would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Armada (317 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 2010 Nissan Armada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Nissan Armada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 MG X20 | 2010 Nissan Armada | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | X20 | Armada |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 317 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |