2001 MG X20 vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X20 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera (927 HP) has 750 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Koenigsegg Agera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 MG X20 has automatic transmission and 2012 Koenigsegg Agera has manual transmission. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 MG X20 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 MG X20 | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | MG | Koenigsegg |
Model | X20 | Agera |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 927 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |