2001 MG X20 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X20 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (242 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 MG X20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 MG X20 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Make | MG | Land Rover |
| Model | X20 | Range Rover Evoque |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 242 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
