2001 MG ZT vs. 1968 Reliant Regal
To start off, 2001 MG ZT is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Reliant Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Reliant Regal would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG ZT (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1968 Reliant Regal. (29 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1968 Reliant Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 MG ZT weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1968 Reliant Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Reliant Regal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Reliant Regal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 MG ZT (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Reliant Regal. (46 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Reliant Regal.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 MG ZT | 1968 Reliant Regal | |
| Make | MG | Reliant |
| Model | ZT | Regal |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 29 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 46 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 61 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 455 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1940 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 27 L |
