2001 MG ZT vs. 2000 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2001 MG ZT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Subaru Forester. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Subaru Forester would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 MG ZT weights approximately 63 kg more than 2000 Subaru Forester.
Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 MG ZT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 MG ZT (245 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Subaru Forester. (186 Nm). This means 2001 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 MG ZT | 2000 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | MG | Subaru |
| Model | ZT | Forester |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 91.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1512 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |
