2001 MG ZT vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG ZT would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Expedition (306 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2001 MG ZT. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2001 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1077 kg more than 2001 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Expedition is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Expedition. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Expedition (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 MG ZT. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 MG ZT. 2013 Ford Expedition has automatic transmission and 2001 MG ZT has manual transmission. 2001 MG ZT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Expedition will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 MG ZT | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | MG | Ford |
| Model | ZT | Expedition |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 306 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5245 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2332 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3023 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 106 L |
