2001 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 465 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer has manual transmission. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Mitsubishi Lancer 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Mitsubishi Oldsmobile
Model Lancer Cutlass
Year Released 2001 1969
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1834 cc 5736 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1145 kg 1610 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 5280 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1960 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2960 mm