2001 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 740 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer (382 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Aveo. (142 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Lancer | Aveo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1709 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1506 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2479 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 45 L |