2001 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 456 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Jeep Compass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer (382 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
Model | Lancer | Compass |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 224 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 97 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1449 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 51 L |