2001 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 110 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi Minica | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Smart |
Model | Minica | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 1820 mm |