2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 206 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
Model | Space Wagon | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |