2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (160 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 505 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo C70. (230 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | SUW | C70 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1097 cc | 1984 cc |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1400 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 68 L |
