2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2007 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (253 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 199 kg more than 2007 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2007 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2007 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
Model | SUW | CTS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1097 cc | 3564 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 253 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 343 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1706 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 66 L |