2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V50 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 307 kg more than 2009 Volvo V50.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo V50 (321 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 2009 Volvo V50 has manual transmission. 2009 Volvo V50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | SUW | V50 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1097 cc | 2521 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 321 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1598 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 62 L |