2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 214 kg more than 2010 Dodge Dakota.
Because 2010 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
Model | SUW | Dakota |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1097 cc | 3701 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1691 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 83 L |